From: Modernmili@aol.com
Message-ID: <5913d4ef.361397d3@aol.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 1998 10:55:15 EDT
To: babylon5-wars@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
Mime-Version: 1.0
Subject: [B5W] Centauri vs EA battle report. . .
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-babylon5-wars@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: babylon5-wars@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU

I played a game last night with Aaron Foss. . .

Centauri:  Octurian, 2 Darkner, 2 Maximus, 3 Haven, 18 Sentri
EA:  Advanced Destroyer, ORACLE, 2 Olympus, 13 Starfury, 6 Thunderbolt

We used playtest rules for the Destroyer so I won't give anything away about
its performance.  

Very close game.  The Oracle really does give those olympus a great chance of
hitting with the missiles.  My opponant did fly the Oracle in backwards but I
never took the luxury of shooting at it so (because?) it was moot.  I think
Olympus that shoot at fighters really aren't doing any damage.  Because of
Jinking I only lost 2 or 3 fighters to missiles (12 from thunderbolts one
round hit twice.)

Again, Battle Lasers and Twin Arrays ruled the battle.  I killed 7 'Furies and
a 'Bolt with TA fire.  One Olympus had 5 points of primary structure after a
run in with 2 Havens.  Granted, in that attack run all three Havens were
destroyed by Pulse Cannons and a certain Destroyer.  

All in all, I think the Oracle is just about right.  Not too expensive, not
under so.

								-Carlos


-- End --